您的账号已在其他设备登录,您当前账号已强迫下线,
如非您本人操作,建议您在会员中心进行密码修改

确定
收藏 | 浏览13

The aim of this study was to compare numbers of pulmonary nodules detected with maximum intensity projections using a slab thickness of 15 mm (MIP 15) and 30 mm (MIP 30) with single image (SI) presentation of chest CT scans. Two readers reviewed MIP 15, MIP 30, and SI presentations of 10-mm (n = 8) and 5-mm collimation (n = 10) helical CT scans and recorded size, location, and diagnostic confidence (definite, probable) of pulmonary nodules. Readers 1 and 2 recorded more nodules with MIP 15 than with SI: 10-mm collimation, 77/64 and 60/56; 5-mm collimation, 64/60 and 40/36; and more "definite" nodules (10-mm collimation: 68/57 and 51/42; 5-mm collimation: 43/36 and 34/30). MIP 15 also detected more nodules than MIP 30 at 10-mm collimation: 77/72 and 60/50; with no major differences at 5-mm collimation: 64/66 and 40/38; and more "definite" nodules (10-mm collimation: 68/58 and 51/36; 5-mm collimation: 43/39 and 34/29). There were only minor differences between SI and MIP 30. Reading time and image number per study were reduced with MIP presentations by a factor of 1.4-5.3. There were no significant differences in the number of nodules detected with SI, MIP 15, and MIP 30, but MIP presentation reduced reporting time and filming cost when compared with SI reporting. For detection of nodules MIP 15 was slightly superior to MIP 30.

作者:S, Diederich;M G, Lentschig;T R, Overbeck;D, Wormanns;W, Heindel

来源:European radiology 2001 年 11卷 8期

知识库介绍

临床诊疗知识库该平台旨在解决临床医护人员在学习、工作中对医学信息的需求,方便快速、便捷的获取实用的医学信息,辅助临床决策参考。该库包含疾病、药品、检查、指南规范、病例文献及循证文献等多种丰富权威的临床资源。

详细介绍
热门关注
免责声明:本知识库提供的有关内容等信息仅供学习参考,不代替医生的诊断和医嘱。

收藏
| 浏览:13
作者:
S, Diederich;M G, Lentschig;T R, Overbeck;D, Wormanns;W, Heindel
来源:
European radiology 2001 年 11卷 8期
The aim of this study was to compare numbers of pulmonary nodules detected with maximum intensity projections using a slab thickness of 15 mm (MIP 15) and 30 mm (MIP 30) with single image (SI) presentation of chest CT scans. Two readers reviewed MIP 15, MIP 30, and SI presentations of 10-mm (n = 8) and 5-mm collimation (n = 10) helical CT scans and recorded size, location, and diagnostic confidence (definite, probable) of pulmonary nodules. Readers 1 and 2 recorded more nodules with MIP 15 than with SI: 10-mm collimation, 77/64 and 60/56; 5-mm collimation, 64/60 and 40/36; and more "definite" nodules (10-mm collimation: 68/57 and 51/42; 5-mm collimation: 43/36 and 34/30). MIP 15 also detected more nodules than MIP 30 at 10-mm collimation: 77/72 and 60/50; with no major differences at 5-mm collimation: 64/66 and 40/38; and more "definite" nodules (10-mm collimation: 68/58 and 51/36; 5-mm collimation: 43/39 and 34/29). There were only minor differences between SI and MIP 30. Reading time and image number per study were reduced with MIP presentations by a factor of 1.4-5.3. There were no significant differences in the number of nodules detected with SI, MIP 15, and MIP 30, but MIP presentation reduced reporting time and filming cost when compared with SI reporting. For detection of nodules MIP 15 was slightly superior to MIP 30.