您的账号已在其他设备登录,您当前账号已强迫下线,
如非您本人操作,建议您在会员中心进行密码修改

确定
收藏 | 浏览38

Federal courts are increasingly being called upon to adjudicate disputes involving controversial new biomedical technologies or government efforts to control environmental and health risks. The authors cite some examples and examine various proposals that have been made to better equip the courts to deal with these complex disputes. They conclude that the proposals fall seriously short by focusing on questions of technical competence without addressing the basic moral and public policy implications of modern science and technology.

作者:Sheila, Jasanoff;Dorothy, Nelkin

来源:Science (New York, N.Y.) 1981 年 214卷 4526期

知识库介绍

临床诊疗知识库该平台旨在解决临床医护人员在学习、工作中对医学信息的需求,方便快速、便捷的获取实用的医学信息,辅助临床决策参考。该库包含疾病、药品、检查、指南规范、病例文献及循证文献等多种丰富权威的临床资源。

详细介绍
热门关注
免责声明:本知识库提供的有关内容等信息仅供学习参考,不代替医生的诊断和医嘱。

收藏
| 浏览:38
作者:
Sheila, Jasanoff;Dorothy, Nelkin
来源:
Science (New York, N.Y.) 1981 年 214卷 4526期
标签:
Health Care and Public Health
Federal courts are increasingly being called upon to adjudicate disputes involving controversial new biomedical technologies or government efforts to control environmental and health risks. The authors cite some examples and examine various proposals that have been made to better equip the courts to deal with these complex disputes. They conclude that the proposals fall seriously short by focusing on questions of technical competence without addressing the basic moral and public policy implications of modern science and technology.