您的账号已在其他设备登录,您当前账号已强迫下线,
如非您本人操作,建议您在会员中心进行密码修改

确定
收藏 | 浏览27

This case report describes a failure after correct clip application at a time unrelated to pregnancy and discusses some implications of this form of sterilization. A 26-year-old patient with 3 children had a laparoscopic clip sterilization performed by a double portal approach. A good view of a normal pelvis was obtained and a clip applied to the isthmic region of each tube, approximately 2 cm from the cornu. The clips appeared to be completely across both tubes. The patient presented again 4 months later with a history of 7 weeks' amenorrhea and a positive pregnancy test. Vagainal suction termination of the pregnancy was performed and bilateral partial salpingectomy performed through a small transverse suprapubic incision. The portion of tube beneath the left clip was completely occluded on histological examination, while that on the right was obviously patent. The clips were completely across and correctly applied at right angles to the isthmic regions with no other adjacent structures included: the hinges were apparently intact and the springs were fully engaged. Most reported cases of pregnancy when clips were thought to have been correctly applied (although such application is rarely confirmed by further study) occur within 11 months of the primary procedure, suggesting failure of tubal occlusion to be the cause, rather than recanalization. It is believed that this pregnant case is the 1st reported in which failure to occlude a tube has been followed by careful assessment of the anatomical correctness of application and histological examination of the clipped portions of both tubes. The case demonstrates that even when clips are correctly applied, with careful exclusion of adjacent nontubal structures, and at a time unrelated to pregnancy, there is still no visible evidence of tubal occlusion such as that seen after ring or coagulation procedures. While it is possible that the clip mechanism itself was at fault, both clips were completely locked over their respective tubes, and one had produced absolute histological obliteration of the lumen. Failure of the clip method, however rare, may therefore be entirely unpredictable. It appears that further evaluation of clip application is indicated in view of this failure with anatomically normal, nonpregnant tubes.

作者:P E, Savage;G, Dixon

来源:Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 1981 年 1卷 3期

知识库介绍

临床诊疗知识库该平台旨在解决临床医护人员在学习、工作中对医学信息的需求,方便快速、便捷的获取实用的医学信息,辅助临床决策参考。该库包含疾病、药品、检查、指南规范、病例文献及循证文献等多种丰富权威的临床资源。

详细介绍
热门关注
免责声明:本知识库提供的有关内容等信息仅供学习参考,不代替医生的诊断和医嘱。

收藏
| 浏览:27
作者:
P E, Savage;G, Dixon
来源:
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology 1981 年 1卷 3期
标签:
Case Studies Clips Contraception Contraception Failure Contraceptive Usage Equipment And Supplies Evaluation Family Planning Female Sterilization Research Methodology Sterilization, Sexual Studies Surgical Equipment Tubal Occlusion
This case report describes a failure after correct clip application at a time unrelated to pregnancy and discusses some implications of this form of sterilization. A 26-year-old patient with 3 children had a laparoscopic clip sterilization performed by a double portal approach. A good view of a normal pelvis was obtained and a clip applied to the isthmic region of each tube, approximately 2 cm from the cornu. The clips appeared to be completely across both tubes. The patient presented again 4 months later with a history of 7 weeks' amenorrhea and a positive pregnancy test. Vagainal suction termination of the pregnancy was performed and bilateral partial salpingectomy performed through a small transverse suprapubic incision. The portion of tube beneath the left clip was completely occluded on histological examination, while that on the right was obviously patent. The clips were completely across and correctly applied at right angles to the isthmic regions with no other adjacent structures included: the hinges were apparently intact and the springs were fully engaged. Most reported cases of pregnancy when clips were thought to have been correctly applied (although such application is rarely confirmed by further study) occur within 11 months of the primary procedure, suggesting failure of tubal occlusion to be the cause, rather than recanalization. It is believed that this pregnant case is the 1st reported in which failure to occlude a tube has been followed by careful assessment of the anatomical correctness of application and histological examination of the clipped portions of both tubes. The case demonstrates that even when clips are correctly applied, with careful exclusion of adjacent nontubal structures, and at a time unrelated to pregnancy, there is still no visible evidence of tubal occlusion such as that seen after ring or coagulation procedures. While it is possible that the clip mechanism itself was at fault, both clips were completely locked over their respective tubes, and one had produced absolute histological obliteration of the lumen. Failure of the clip method, however rare, may therefore be entirely unpredictable. It appears that further evaluation of clip application is indicated in view of this failure with anatomically normal, nonpregnant tubes.