您的账号已在其他设备登录,您当前账号已强迫下线,
如非您本人操作,建议您在会员中心进行密码修改

确定
收藏 | 浏览0

Few studies have examined how physicians perceive guidelines, much less their perceptions of an Internet presentation of such guidelines. This study assessed physicians' acceptance ofan Internet-based guideline on the appropriateness of colonoscopy.Gastroenterologists participating in an international observational study consulted an Internet-based guideline for consecutive patients referred for colonoscopy. The guideline was produced by the European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE), using a validated method (RAND). Through the use of questionnaires, physicians were asked their opinions and perspectives of the guideline and website.There were 289 patients included in the study. The mean time for consulting the website was 1.8 min, and it was considered easy to use by 86

作者:Olivier, Terraz;Vincent, Wietlisbach;Jean-Gabriel, Jeannot;Bernard, Burnand;Florian, Froehlich;Jean-Jacques, Gonvers;Jennifer K, Harris;John-Paul, Vader

来源:Digestion 2005 年 71卷 2期

知识库介绍

临床诊疗知识库该平台旨在解决临床医护人员在学习、工作中对医学信息的需求,方便快速、便捷的获取实用的医学信息,辅助临床决策参考。该库包含疾病、药品、检查、指南规范、病例文献及循证文献等多种丰富权威的临床资源。

详细介绍
热门关注
免责声明:本知识库提供的有关内容等信息仅供学习参考,不代替医生的诊断和医嘱。

收藏
| 浏览:0
作者:
Olivier, Terraz;Vincent, Wietlisbach;Jean-Gabriel, Jeannot;Bernard, Burnand;Florian, Froehlich;Jean-Jacques, Gonvers;Jennifer K, Harris;John-Paul, Vader
来源:
Digestion 2005 年 71卷 2期
Few studies have examined how physicians perceive guidelines, much less their perceptions of an Internet presentation of such guidelines. This study assessed physicians' acceptance ofan Internet-based guideline on the appropriateness of colonoscopy.Gastroenterologists participating in an international observational study consulted an Internet-based guideline for consecutive patients referred for colonoscopy. The guideline was produced by the European Panel on the Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (EPAGE), using a validated method (RAND). Through the use of questionnaires, physicians were asked their opinions and perspectives of the guideline and website.There were 289 patients included in the study. The mean time for consulting the website was 1.8 min, and it was considered easy to use by 86