您的账号已在其他设备登录,您当前账号已强迫下线,
如非您本人操作,建议您在会员中心进行密码修改

确定
收藏 | 浏览57

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and performance of the artificial pancreas (AP) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) following insulin omission for food.In a randomized, cross-over trial, adolescents with T1D aged 13-18 yr were enrolled in a randomized, cross-over trial. On separate days, received either usual care (UC) through their home insulin pump or used an AP system (Diabetes Assistant platform, continuous glucose monitor, and insulin pump). Approximately 1 h after admission, participants in both groups received an unannounced snack of 30 g carbohydrate, and 4 h later they received an 80 g lunch, for which both groups only received 75

作者:Daniel R, Cher?avvsky;Mark D, DeBoer;Patrick, Keith-Hynes;Benton, Mize;Molly, McElwee;Susan, Demartini;Spencer F, Dunsmore;Christian, Wakeman;Boris P, Kovatchev;Marc D, Breton

来源:Pediatric diabetes 2016 年 17卷 1期

相似文献
知识库介绍

临床诊疗知识库该平台旨在解决临床医护人员在学习、工作中对医学信息的需求,方便快速、便捷的获取实用的医学信息,辅助临床决策参考。该库包含疾病、药品、检查、指南规范、病例文献及循证文献等多种丰富权威的临床资源。

详细介绍
热门关注
免责声明:本知识库提供的有关内容等信息仅供学习参考,不代替医生的诊断和医嘱。

收藏
| 浏览:57
作者:
Daniel R, Cher?avvsky;Mark D, DeBoer;Patrick, Keith-Hynes;Benton, Mize;Molly, McElwee;Susan, Demartini;Spencer F, Dunsmore;Christian, Wakeman;Boris P, Kovatchev;Marc D, Breton
来源:
Pediatric diabetes 2016 年 17卷 1期
标签:
adolescent artificial pancreas closed-loop control snacking type 1 diabetes
The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and performance of the artificial pancreas (AP) in adolescents with type 1 diabetes (T1D) following insulin omission for food.In a randomized, cross-over trial, adolescents with T1D aged 13-18 yr were enrolled in a randomized, cross-over trial. On separate days, received either usual care (UC) through their home insulin pump or used an AP system (Diabetes Assistant platform, continuous glucose monitor, and insulin pump). Approximately 1 h after admission, participants in both groups received an unannounced snack of 30 g carbohydrate, and 4 h later they received an 80 g lunch, for which both groups only received 75