您的账号已在其他设备登录,您当前账号已强迫下线,
如非您本人操作,建议您在会员中心进行密码修改

确定
收藏 | 浏览0

Chemoproteomics-based competition-binding assays allow the screening of compounds against endogenous proteins in cell or tissue extracts, but these assays are hampered by low throughput and high cost. Using compound pools rather than single compounds in a screening campaign holds the promise of increased efficiency and substantial cost reduction. Previous attempts to screen compounds in pools often fell short due to complex data tracking, deconvolution issues, compound interferences, and automation problems. The desire to screen compounds in a high-throughput chemoproteomics format sparked a reassessment of compound pooling. Through the integration of acoustic dispensing, we enabled a flexible pooling process, allowing mixture creation by combining randomized or specific samples to create defined pools. Automation enabled end-to-end tracking, using barcode scan check points and output files to track data and ensure integrity during the mixture creation process. The compound pooling approach proved to be highly compatible with the chemoproteomics assay technology. Pools of 10 compounds in a single well did not show compound interference effects or increased false-positive/negative rates. In the present study, four targets, TBK1, PI3Kδ, PI3Kγ, and mTOR, were screened using a chemoproteomics approach against pools of 10 compounds per well, resulting in robust hit identification.

作者:Elsa, Salzer;Elizabeth, Nixon;Gerard, Drewes;Friedrich, Reinhard;Giovanna, Bergamini;Christina, Rau

来源:Journal of laboratory automation 2016 年 21卷 1期

知识库介绍

临床诊疗知识库该平台旨在解决临床医护人员在学习、工作中对医学信息的需求,方便快速、便捷的获取实用的医学信息,辅助临床决策参考。该库包含疾病、药品、检查、指南规范、病例文献及循证文献等多种丰富权威的临床资源。

详细介绍
热门关注
免责声明:本知识库提供的有关内容等信息仅供学习参考,不代替医生的诊断和医嘱。

收藏
| 浏览:0
作者:
Elsa, Salzer;Elizabeth, Nixon;Gerard, Drewes;Friedrich, Reinhard;Giovanna, Bergamini;Christina, Rau
来源:
Journal of laboratory automation 2016 年 21卷 1期
标签:
acoustic dispenser chemoproteomics compound pooling high-throughput screening (HTS)
Chemoproteomics-based competition-binding assays allow the screening of compounds against endogenous proteins in cell or tissue extracts, but these assays are hampered by low throughput and high cost. Using compound pools rather than single compounds in a screening campaign holds the promise of increased efficiency and substantial cost reduction. Previous attempts to screen compounds in pools often fell short due to complex data tracking, deconvolution issues, compound interferences, and automation problems. The desire to screen compounds in a high-throughput chemoproteomics format sparked a reassessment of compound pooling. Through the integration of acoustic dispensing, we enabled a flexible pooling process, allowing mixture creation by combining randomized or specific samples to create defined pools. Automation enabled end-to-end tracking, using barcode scan check points and output files to track data and ensure integrity during the mixture creation process. The compound pooling approach proved to be highly compatible with the chemoproteomics assay technology. Pools of 10 compounds in a single well did not show compound interference effects or increased false-positive/negative rates. In the present study, four targets, TBK1, PI3Kδ, PI3Kγ, and mTOR, were screened using a chemoproteomics approach against pools of 10 compounds per well, resulting in robust hit identification.