您的账号已在其他设备登录,您当前账号已强迫下线,
如非您本人操作,建议您在会员中心进行密码修改

确定
收藏 | 浏览37

To evaluate the accuracy of measuring peri-implant buccal bone when using three different computed tomography devices.Sixty tissue-level or bone-level dental implants were placed in bovine ribs with either buccal bone full coverage, dehiscence or fenestration. For each site, the distance from the bone defect to the implant neck and the buccal bone thickness 1 mm apical to the crest were measured using a calliper. Subsequently, all sites were scanned in a reproducible position using a multi-slice computed tomography (CT) (Brightspeed, voxel size 0.625 mm) and two cone-beam computed tomography devices (i-CAT NG, voxel size 0.3 mm and Newtom VGi, voxel size 0.2 mm). Bone thickness was measured on images from the three systems similar to direct measurements and differences were evaluated. Factors that could influence the buccal bone identification were assessed by multiple binary logistic regression.Buccal bone ranged from 0.1 mm to 2.75 mm in thickness and was not visible in 68

作者:Oscar, González-Martín;Carlos, Oteo;Ricardo, Ortega;Javier, Alandez;Mariano, Sanz;Mario, Veltri

来源:Clinical oral implants research 2016 年 27卷 8期

相似文献
知识库介绍

临床诊疗知识库该平台旨在解决临床医护人员在学习、工作中对医学信息的需求,方便快速、便捷的获取实用的医学信息,辅助临床决策参考。该库包含疾病、药品、检查、指南规范、病例文献及循证文献等多种丰富权威的临床资源。

详细介绍
热门关注
免责声明:本知识库提供的有关内容等信息仅供学习参考,不代替医生的诊断和医嘱。

收藏
| 浏览:37
作者:
Oscar, González-Martín;Carlos, Oteo;Ricardo, Ortega;Javier, Alandez;Mariano, Sanz;Mario, Veltri
来源:
Clinical oral implants research 2016 年 27卷 8期
标签:
cone-beam CT cortical bone dental implant
To evaluate the accuracy of measuring peri-implant buccal bone when using three different computed tomography devices.Sixty tissue-level or bone-level dental implants were placed in bovine ribs with either buccal bone full coverage, dehiscence or fenestration. For each site, the distance from the bone defect to the implant neck and the buccal bone thickness 1 mm apical to the crest were measured using a calliper. Subsequently, all sites were scanned in a reproducible position using a multi-slice computed tomography (CT) (Brightspeed, voxel size 0.625 mm) and two cone-beam computed tomography devices (i-CAT NG, voxel size 0.3 mm and Newtom VGi, voxel size 0.2 mm). Bone thickness was measured on images from the three systems similar to direct measurements and differences were evaluated. Factors that could influence the buccal bone identification were assessed by multiple binary logistic regression.Buccal bone ranged from 0.1 mm to 2.75 mm in thickness and was not visible in 68