您的账号已在其他设备登录,您当前账号已强迫下线,
如非您本人操作,建议您在会员中心进行密码修改

确定
收藏 | 浏览39

This systematic review aimed to examine empirical evidence concerning the efficacy of psychosocial interventions in ameliorating the psychosocial problems of people with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).A comprehensive literature search was undertaken to identify both published and non-published English randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from 2000 to 2015. Two reviewers independently screened, assessed risks for bias, and extracted data. Comprehensive meta-analysis software was used to analyse the extracted data. Hedges's g effect size was used to determine the effects of psychosocial interventions.Thirty studies were included in the review but only 18 studies reported significant short-term effects of psychosocial interventions in CVD patients. Most studies did not report long-term effects. Average effect sizes for stress, anxiety, depression, and combined depression/anxiety were 0.34, 1.04, 0.42 and 0.67 respectively at post-tests. Those numbers became 0.09, 0.65, 0.22 and 0.09 at follow-up assessments. Psychosocial programmes with psychoeducation and stress management helped reduce patients' stress and anxiety levels. Programmes including psychotherapy, counselling, mindfulness-based intervention (MBI), and stress management helped mitigate depression and anxiety.The findings support the efficacy of some psychosocial interventions in people with CVDs.Healthcare providers should monitor patients' psychological problems and may integrate psychosocial interventions as part of treatment plans.

作者:Piyanee, Klainin-Yobas;Shu Huey, Ng;Pricilia Dew Maria, Stephen;Ying, Lau

来源:Patient education and counseling 2016 年 99卷 4期

相似文献
知识库介绍

临床诊疗知识库该平台旨在解决临床医护人员在学习、工作中对医学信息的需求,方便快速、便捷的获取实用的医学信息,辅助临床决策参考。该库包含疾病、药品、检查、指南规范、病例文献及循证文献等多种丰富权威的临床资源。

详细介绍
热门关注
免责声明:本知识库提供的有关内容等信息仅供学习参考,不代替医生的诊断和医嘱。

收藏
| 浏览:39
作者:
Piyanee, Klainin-Yobas;Shu Huey, Ng;Pricilia Dew Maria, Stephen;Ying, Lau
来源:
Patient education and counseling 2016 年 99卷 4期
标签:
Anxiety Cardiovascular diseases Depression Psychosocial interventions Stress
This systematic review aimed to examine empirical evidence concerning the efficacy of psychosocial interventions in ameliorating the psychosocial problems of people with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs).A comprehensive literature search was undertaken to identify both published and non-published English randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from 2000 to 2015. Two reviewers independently screened, assessed risks for bias, and extracted data. Comprehensive meta-analysis software was used to analyse the extracted data. Hedges's g effect size was used to determine the effects of psychosocial interventions.Thirty studies were included in the review but only 18 studies reported significant short-term effects of psychosocial interventions in CVD patients. Most studies did not report long-term effects. Average effect sizes for stress, anxiety, depression, and combined depression/anxiety were 0.34, 1.04, 0.42 and 0.67 respectively at post-tests. Those numbers became 0.09, 0.65, 0.22 and 0.09 at follow-up assessments. Psychosocial programmes with psychoeducation and stress management helped reduce patients' stress and anxiety levels. Programmes including psychotherapy, counselling, mindfulness-based intervention (MBI), and stress management helped mitigate depression and anxiety.The findings support the efficacy of some psychosocial interventions in people with CVDs.Healthcare providers should monitor patients' psychological problems and may integrate psychosocial interventions as part of treatment plans.