您的账号已在其他设备登录,您当前账号已强迫下线,
如非您本人操作,建议您在会员中心进行密码修改

确定
收藏 | 浏览14

Objectives A two-part review was undertaken to: (1) summarize current guidelines on the timing and frequency of postpartum follow-up care for generally healthy, non-high risk postpartum women and to delineate the evidence on which these guidelines are based; and, (2) summarize the results of intervention studies focused on increasing utilization of the postpartum visit for generally healthy, non-high risk postpartum women. Methods A review of guidelines from high and upper middle income countries published between 2000 and 2016 in English related to non-high risk postpartum follow-up visits was conducted in 2014-2016 using four databases and additional sources. In addition, articles published between 1990 and 2016 which evaluated interventions from high to upper middle income countries related to increasing attendance at the postpartum visit were gathered using three databases. Results This review located eight guidelines, all of which relied on expert opinion/group consensus as the evidence for their recommendations regarding the timing of the postpartum visit. The review located 19 intervention studies focused on increasing use of the postpartum visit; in 12 there was statistically significant evidence that these approaches improved utilization. However, no intervention strategy was evaluated more than a few times and many of the evaluations were relatively dated. Conclusions Guidelines for the timing of the postpartum visit are variable and are typically based on weak evidence; however, there is support for increased flexibility to meet women's needs. Additionally, while there is a diverse set of promising interventions to increase utilization of the postpartum visit, there is limited evaluative information. Future initiatives should focus on more rigorous evaluation.

作者:Katrina, Stumbras;Kristin, Rankin;Rachel, Caskey;Sadia, Haider;Arden, Handler

来源:Maternal and child health journal 2016 年 20卷 Suppl 1期

知识库介绍

临床诊疗知识库该平台旨在解决临床医护人员在学习、工作中对医学信息的需求,方便快速、便捷的获取实用的医学信息,辅助临床决策参考。该库包含疾病、药品、检查、指南规范、病例文献及循证文献等多种丰富权威的临床资源。

详细介绍
热门关注
免责声明:本知识库提供的有关内容等信息仅供学习参考,不代替医生的诊断和医嘱。

收藏
| 浏览:14
作者:
Katrina, Stumbras;Kristin, Rankin;Rachel, Caskey;Sadia, Haider;Arden, Handler
来源:
Maternal and child health journal 2016 年 20卷 Suppl 1期
标签:
Antenatal and postnatal interventions Guidelines Postpartum follow-up care Postpartum visit
Objectives A two-part review was undertaken to: (1) summarize current guidelines on the timing and frequency of postpartum follow-up care for generally healthy, non-high risk postpartum women and to delineate the evidence on which these guidelines are based; and, (2) summarize the results of intervention studies focused on increasing utilization of the postpartum visit for generally healthy, non-high risk postpartum women. Methods A review of guidelines from high and upper middle income countries published between 2000 and 2016 in English related to non-high risk postpartum follow-up visits was conducted in 2014-2016 using four databases and additional sources. In addition, articles published between 1990 and 2016 which evaluated interventions from high to upper middle income countries related to increasing attendance at the postpartum visit were gathered using three databases. Results This review located eight guidelines, all of which relied on expert opinion/group consensus as the evidence for their recommendations regarding the timing of the postpartum visit. The review located 19 intervention studies focused on increasing use of the postpartum visit; in 12 there was statistically significant evidence that these approaches improved utilization. However, no intervention strategy was evaluated more than a few times and many of the evaluations were relatively dated. Conclusions Guidelines for the timing of the postpartum visit are variable and are typically based on weak evidence; however, there is support for increased flexibility to meet women's needs. Additionally, while there is a diverse set of promising interventions to increase utilization of the postpartum visit, there is limited evaluative information. Future initiatives should focus on more rigorous evaluation.