您的账号已在其他设备登录,您当前账号已强迫下线,
如非您本人操作,建议您在会员中心进行密码修改

确定
收藏 | 浏览16

Hemorrhagic shock has been associated with an increased risk of infection after injury. The immediate and long term effects of hemorrhagic shock without tissue injury on the susceptibility of an animal to infection and the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent infection in this setting were examined. Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to hemorrhagic shock (LD15) by bleeding to a mean arterial pressure of 45 millimeters of mercury for 45 minutes and were resuscitated with shed blood and normal saline solution. In one experiment, dorsal wounds were inoculated one hour before or after shock with either 10(6), 10(8) or 10(10) Staphylococcus aureus. In a second experiment, rats were infected at one hour, or one, three or five days after shock with 10(6), 10(7) or 10(8) S. aureus. Equivalent numbers of rats received cefamandole nafate prior to bacterial challenge. Hemorrhagic shock increased the susceptibility to wound infection at all inocula. Infection increased whether rats were wounded before or after shock, and this effect was sustained for up to three days. Antibiotic prophylaxis was of limited value in reducing the incidence of wound infection after shock.

作者:D H, Livingston;M A, Malangoni

来源:Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics 1989 年 168卷 2期

知识库介绍

临床诊疗知识库该平台旨在解决临床医护人员在学习、工作中对医学信息的需求,方便快速、便捷的获取实用的医学信息,辅助临床决策参考。该库包含疾病、药品、检查、指南规范、病例文献及循证文献等多种丰富权威的临床资源。

详细介绍
热门关注
免责声明:本知识库提供的有关内容等信息仅供学习参考,不代替医生的诊断和医嘱。

收藏
| 浏览:16
作者:
D H, Livingston;M A, Malangoni
来源:
Surgery, gynecology & obstetrics 1989 年 168卷 2期
Hemorrhagic shock has been associated with an increased risk of infection after injury. The immediate and long term effects of hemorrhagic shock without tissue injury on the susceptibility of an animal to infection and the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent infection in this setting were examined. Sprague-Dawley rats were subjected to hemorrhagic shock (LD15) by bleeding to a mean arterial pressure of 45 millimeters of mercury for 45 minutes and were resuscitated with shed blood and normal saline solution. In one experiment, dorsal wounds were inoculated one hour before or after shock with either 10(6), 10(8) or 10(10) Staphylococcus aureus. In a second experiment, rats were infected at one hour, or one, three or five days after shock with 10(6), 10(7) or 10(8) S. aureus. Equivalent numbers of rats received cefamandole nafate prior to bacterial challenge. Hemorrhagic shock increased the susceptibility to wound infection at all inocula. Infection increased whether rats were wounded before or after shock, and this effect was sustained for up to three days. Antibiotic prophylaxis was of limited value in reducing the incidence of wound infection after shock.