您的账号已在其他设备登录,您当前账号已强迫下线,
如非您本人操作,建议您在会员中心进行密码修改

确定
收藏 | 浏览33 | 下载0

Backgrounds::At present, there is no consensus on the induction methods in term pregnancy with borderline oligohydramnios. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and pregnancy outcomes of labor induction with dinoprostone or single-balloon catheter (SBC) in term nulliparous women with borderline oligohydramnios.Methods::We conducted a retrospective cohort study from January 2016 to November 2018. During the study period, a total of 244 cases were enrolled. Of these, 103 cases were selected for induction using dinoprostone and 141 cases were selected for induction with SBC. The pregnancy outcomes between the two groups were compared. Primary outcomes were successful vaginal delivery rates. Secondary outcomes were maternal and neonatal adverse events. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the risk factors for vaginal delivery failure in the two groups.Results::The successful vaginal delivery rates were similar between the dinoprostone group and the SBC group (64.1

作者:Zhang Yongqing;Chen Luping;Yan Guohui;Zhou Menglin;Chen Zhengyun;Liang Zhaoxia;Chen Danqing

来源:中华医学杂志英文版 2022 年 135卷 6期

知识库介绍

临床诊疗知识库该平台旨在解决临床医护人员在学习、工作中对医学信息的需求,方便快速、便捷的获取实用的医学信息,辅助临床决策参考。该库包含疾病、药品、检查、指南规范、病例文献及循证文献等多种丰富权威的临床资源。

详细介绍
热门关注
免责声明:本知识库提供的有关内容等信息仅供学习参考,不代替医生的诊断和医嘱。

收藏
| 浏览:33 | 下载:0
作者:
Zhang Yongqing;Chen Luping;Yan Guohui;Zhou Menglin;Chen Zhengyun;Liang Zhaoxia;Chen Danqing
来源:
中华医学杂志英文版 2022 年 135卷 6期
标签:
Borderline oligohydramnios Induction of labor Single-balloon catheter Dinoprostone Nuchal cord Borderline oligohydramnios Induction of labor Single-balloon catheter Dinoprostone Nuchal cord
Backgrounds::At present, there is no consensus on the induction methods in term pregnancy with borderline oligohydramnios. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and pregnancy outcomes of labor induction with dinoprostone or single-balloon catheter (SBC) in term nulliparous women with borderline oligohydramnios.Methods::We conducted a retrospective cohort study from January 2016 to November 2018. During the study period, a total of 244 cases were enrolled. Of these, 103 cases were selected for induction using dinoprostone and 141 cases were selected for induction with SBC. The pregnancy outcomes between the two groups were compared. Primary outcomes were successful vaginal delivery rates. Secondary outcomes were maternal and neonatal adverse events. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the risk factors for vaginal delivery failure in the two groups.Results::The successful vaginal delivery rates were similar between the dinoprostone group and the SBC group (64.1