您的账号已在其他设备登录,您当前账号已强迫下线,
如非您本人操作,建议您在会员中心进行密码修改

确定
收藏 | 浏览8

A challenging goal of molecular epidemiology is to identify an individual's risk of cancer. Molecular epidemiology integrates molecular biology, in vitro and in vivo laboratory models, biochemistry, and epidemiology to infer individual cancer risk. Molecular dosimetry of carcinogen exposure is an important facet of molecular epidemiology and cancer risk assessment. Carcinogen macromolecular adduct levels, cytogenetic alterations and somatic cell mutations can be measured to determine the biologically-effective doses of carcinogens. Molecular epidemiology also explores host cancer susceptibilities, such as carcinogen metabolism, DNA repair, and epigenetic and genetic alterations in tumor suppressor genes. p53 is a prototype tumor suppressor gene and is well suited for analysis of mutational spectrum in human cancer. The analyses of germline and somatic mutation spectra of the p53 tumor suppressor gene provide important clues for cancer risk assessment in molecular epidemiology. For example, characteristic p53 mutation spectra have been associated with: dietary aflatoxin B1 exposure and hepatocellular carcinoma; sunlight exposure and skin carcinoma; and cigarette smoking and lung cancer. The mutation spectrum also reveals those p53 mutants that provide cells with a selective clonal-expansion advantage during the multistep process of carcinogenesis. The p53 gene encodes a multifunctional protein involved in the cellular response to stress including DNA damage and hypoxia. Certain p53 mutants lose tumor suppressor activity and gain oncogenic activity, which is one explanation for the commonality of p53 mutations in human cancer. Molecular epidemiological results can be evaluated for causation by inference of the Bradford-Hill criteria, i.e. strength of association (consistency, specificity and temporality) and biological plausibility, which utilizes the 'weight of the evidence principle'.

作者:S P, Hussain;C C, Harris

来源:Toxicology letters 1998 年 102-103卷

知识库介绍

临床诊疗知识库该平台旨在解决临床医护人员在学习、工作中对医学信息的需求,方便快速、便捷的获取实用的医学信息,辅助临床决策参考。该库包含疾病、药品、检查、指南规范、病例文献及循证文献等多种丰富权威的临床资源。

详细介绍
热门关注
免责声明:本知识库提供的有关内容等信息仅供学习参考,不代替医生的诊断和医嘱。

收藏
| 浏览:8
作者:
S P, Hussain;C C, Harris
来源:
Toxicology letters 1998 年 102-103卷
A challenging goal of molecular epidemiology is to identify an individual's risk of cancer. Molecular epidemiology integrates molecular biology, in vitro and in vivo laboratory models, biochemistry, and epidemiology to infer individual cancer risk. Molecular dosimetry of carcinogen exposure is an important facet of molecular epidemiology and cancer risk assessment. Carcinogen macromolecular adduct levels, cytogenetic alterations and somatic cell mutations can be measured to determine the biologically-effective doses of carcinogens. Molecular epidemiology also explores host cancer susceptibilities, such as carcinogen metabolism, DNA repair, and epigenetic and genetic alterations in tumor suppressor genes. p53 is a prototype tumor suppressor gene and is well suited for analysis of mutational spectrum in human cancer. The analyses of germline and somatic mutation spectra of the p53 tumor suppressor gene provide important clues for cancer risk assessment in molecular epidemiology. For example, characteristic p53 mutation spectra have been associated with: dietary aflatoxin B1 exposure and hepatocellular carcinoma; sunlight exposure and skin carcinoma; and cigarette smoking and lung cancer. The mutation spectrum also reveals those p53 mutants that provide cells with a selective clonal-expansion advantage during the multistep process of carcinogenesis. The p53 gene encodes a multifunctional protein involved in the cellular response to stress including DNA damage and hypoxia. Certain p53 mutants lose tumor suppressor activity and gain oncogenic activity, which is one explanation for the commonality of p53 mutations in human cancer. Molecular epidemiological results can be evaluated for causation by inference of the Bradford-Hill criteria, i.e. strength of association (consistency, specificity and temporality) and biological plausibility, which utilizes the 'weight of the evidence principle'.